Solar Panels

Jinko Tiger Neo 435W vs Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Side-by-side comparison based on specs, real pricing, and our crew's installation experience. Updated for 2026.

Jinko Solar

Silfab

Choose Jinko Tiger Neo 435W if:

Lowest cost per watt in our lineup
Large systems where total cost matters most
Homeowners who want N-type technology at the best price
Ground-mount and carport installations

$0.80-1.00/W (panel only)

8.5

Choose Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W if:

Homeowners who want American-made panels
Qualifying for domestic content ITC adders on commercial projects
Strong snow/wind load tolerance (New England weather)
Installers who value reliable US supply chain

$1.10-1.30/W (panel only)

Spec-by-Spec Comparison

Specification

Jinko Solar Tiger Neo JKM435N-54HL4R-B

Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite

Price

$0.80-1.00/W (panel only)

$1.10-1.30/W (panel only)

Warranty

25 years

Wattage

435W

420W

Efficiency

22.27%

21.9%

Temp Coefficient

-0.30%/°C

-0.34%/°C

Degradation Rate

0.40%/yr (87.4% at year 30)

0.50%/yr (87.5% at year 25)

Cell Type

N-type TOPCon, half-cut (HOT 2.0)

Monocrystalline, X-pattern backsheet

Dimensions

44.6 x 67.8 x 1.2 in (1134 x 1722 mm)

40.5 x 73.4 x 1.4 in (1029 x 1864 mm)

Weight

46.3 lbs (21 kg)

45.8 lbs (20.8 kg)

Origin

China / Southeast Asia

USA (Burlington, WA)

Frame

Black anodized aluminum

NuWatt Rating

8/10

8.5/10

Pros & Cons

Jinko Tiger Neo 435W

Pros

+World's #1 panel manufacturer by volume — proven at scale
+N-type TOPCon with HOT 2.0 technology — low LID/LETID
+22.27% efficiency — strong for the price
+Only 0.40%/yr degradation — 87.4% at year 30
+All-black aesthetic with slim multi-busbar design

Cons

-Only 12-year product warranty — shorter than premium brands
-Chinese manufacturing — may not qualify for domestic content bonus
-Brand less recognized by homeowners than Q CELLS or REC

Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Pros

+Made in USA (Burlington, WA & Toronto) — qualifies for domestic content bonus
+21.9% efficiency with proprietary X-pattern conductive backsheet
+25-year product warranty — matches Q CELLS and REC
+Rated for 5400 Pa snow load — built for Northeast winters
+No FEOC risk — fully domestic supply chain

Cons

-Lower efficiency than REC or Maxeon premium options
-420W output — less than N-type TOPCon competitors
-Smaller brand — less installer ecosystem than Q CELLS or REC

Installation Notes from Our Crew

Jinko Tiger Neo 435W

Jinko Tiger Neo is our budget champion. Same N-type TOPCon tech as panels costing 30% more. Compact residential form factor installs just like the Canadian Solar. We use Jinko when the customer is cost-focused and wants the most watts per dollar. Excellent supply chain — Jinko ships more panels worldwide than anyone.

Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Silfab is our American-made pick. The panels are slightly lighter than Q CELLS, which crews appreciate on steep roofs. The X-pattern backsheet technology gives solid efficiency without N-type cell costs. We recommend Silfab especially for commercial projects where the domestic content ITC adder adds real savings. Reliable supply chain — no tariff or FEOC concerns.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Jinko Tiger Neo 435W or Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W better?

The Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W scores 8.5/10 vs 8/10 in our rating. It excels at: homeowners who want american-made panels. The Jinko Tiger Neo 435W is the better choice if: lowest cost per watt in our lineup. The right pick depends on your specific situation.

How much does the Jinko Tiger Neo 435W cost vs the Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W?

The Jinko Tiger Neo 435W costs $0.80-1.00/W (panel only). The Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W costs $1.10-1.30/W (panel only). Both prices include professional installation by NuWatt Energy. State incentives may reduce your net cost — use our calculator for exact pricing.

Which has a better warranty?

The Jinko Tiger Neo 435W has a 25-year warranty (12-year product & 30-year performance warranty (87.4% at year 30)). The Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W has a 25-year warranty (25-year product & 30-year performance warranty). Both offer the same warranty length.

Does NuWatt install both the Jinko Tiger Neo 435W and Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W?

Yes. NuWatt Energy installs both products and our crew has hands-on experience with each. We can help you choose based on your home, energy goals, and budget during a free consultation.

Can I switch from Jinko Solar to Silfab later?

In most cases, yes. Solar panels can be replaced individually if needed, though it's best to install matching panels. Mixing panel types on the same string inverter can reduce performance. Contact NuWatt for a specific assessment of your system.

Related Comparisons

Solar Panels

Q CELLS Q.PEAK DUO BLK ML-G10+ 415W vs REC Alpha Pure-RX 470W

Solar Panels

Q CELLS Q.PEAK DUO BLK ML-G10+ 415W vs Canadian Solar TOPHiKu6 435W

Solar Panels

Q CELLS Q.PEAK DUO BLK ML-G10+ 415W vs Jinko Tiger Neo 435W

Solar Panels

REC Alpha Pure-RX 470W vs Maxeon 7 475W

Solar Panels

Canadian Solar TOPHiKu6 435W vs Jinko Tiger Neo 435W

Solar Panels

Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W vs Q CELLS Q.PEAK DUO BLK ML-G10+ 415W

Solar Panels

Maxeon 7 475W vs Q CELLS Q.PEAK DUO BLK ML-G10+ 415W

Solar Panels

REC Alpha Pure-RX 470W vs Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Solar Panels

Canadian Solar TOPHiKu6 435W vs Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Not Sure Which to Choose?

Our energy advisors help you pick the right equipment based on your home, energy usage, and budget. Free consultation — no obligation.

Get a Free Quote Try Instant Quote Tool

Back to all equipment comparisons

Loading NuWatt Energy...

Spec-by-Spec Comparison

Specification

Jinko Solar Tiger Neo JKM435N-54HL4R-B

Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite

Price

$0.80-1.00/W (panel only)

$1.10-1.30/W (panel only)

Warranty

25 years

Wattage

435W

420W

Efficiency

22.27%

21.9%

Temp Coefficient

-0.30%/°C

-0.34%/°C

Degradation Rate

0.40%/yr (87.4% at year 30)

0.50%/yr (87.5% at year 25)

Cell Type

N-type TOPCon, half-cut (HOT 2.0)

Monocrystalline, X-pattern backsheet

Dimensions

44.6 x 67.8 x 1.2 in (1134 x 1722 mm)

40.5 x 73.4 x 1.4 in (1029 x 1864 mm)

Weight

46.3 lbs (21 kg)

45.8 lbs (20.8 kg)

Origin

China / Southeast Asia

USA (Burlington, WA)

Frame

Black anodized aluminum

NuWatt Rating

8/10

8.5/10

Pros & Cons

Jinko Tiger Neo 435W

Pros

+World's #1 panel manufacturer by volume — proven at scale
+N-type TOPCon with HOT 2.0 technology — low LID/LETID
+22.27% efficiency — strong for the price
+Only 0.40%/yr degradation — 87.4% at year 30
+All-black aesthetic with slim multi-busbar design

Cons

-Only 12-year product warranty — shorter than premium brands
-Chinese manufacturing — may not qualify for domestic content bonus
-Brand less recognized by homeowners than Q CELLS or REC

Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Pros

+Made in USA (Burlington, WA & Toronto) — qualifies for domestic content bonus
+21.9% efficiency with proprietary X-pattern conductive backsheet
+25-year product warranty — matches Q CELLS and REC
+Rated for 5400 Pa snow load — built for Northeast winters
+No FEOC risk — fully domestic supply chain

Cons

-Lower efficiency than REC or Maxeon premium options
-420W output — less than N-type TOPCon competitors
-Smaller brand — less installer ecosystem than Q CELLS or REC

Installation Notes from Our Crew

Jinko Tiger Neo 435W

Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Jinko Tiger Neo 435W or Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W better?

How much does the Jinko Tiger Neo 435W cost vs the Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W?

Which has a better warranty?

Does NuWatt install both the Jinko Tiger Neo 435W and Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W?

Yes. NuWatt Energy installs both products and our crew has hands-on experience with each. We can help you choose based on your home, energy goals, and budget during a free consultation.

Can I switch from Jinko Solar to Silfab later?

Update Location

Jinko Tiger Neo 435W vs Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Choose Jinko Tiger Neo 435W if:

Choose Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W if:

Spec-by-Spec Comparison

Pros & Cons

Jinko Tiger Neo 435W

Pros

Cons

Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Pros

Cons

Installation Notes from Our Crew

Jinko Tiger Neo 435W

Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons

Not Sure Which to Choose?

Jinko Tiger Neo 435W vs Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Choose Jinko Tiger Neo 435W if:

Choose Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W if:

Spec-by-Spec Comparison

Pros & Cons

Jinko Tiger Neo 435W

Pros

Cons

Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Pros

Cons

Installation Notes from Our Crew

Jinko Tiger Neo 435W

Silfab SIL-420 BG Elite 420W

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Comparisons

Not Sure Which to Choose?